Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Connecting the Red, Brown and Green: The Environmental Justice Movement in South Africa

0 comments
Date
Summary

This 34-page study examines the environmental movement in South Africa via two environmental case studies involving mass mobilisation: the Coalition Against Water Privatisation and the Steel Valley Crisis Committee. The central research question this paper addresses is whether there is a single, coherent environmental movement that is mobilising under the comprehensive banner of environmental justice. The paper argues that there is no single, collective actor that constitutes the environmental movement in South Africa and no master "frame" of environmentalism. According to the author, the environmental movement has no coherent centre and no tidy margins; it is an inchoate sum of multiple, diverse, uncoordinated struggles and organisations. However, the paper further argues that a nascent environmental justice movement is emerging which has the capacity for mass mobilisation.

The research involved site visits, focus groups, participant observation, interviews with 30 key informants selected for their expertise on environmental activism, a literature review of secondary sources and documentary analysis of the Iscor court case (editor's note: for background on this case, click here), and environmental publications such as those of the Environmental Justice Networking Forum (EJNF), Groundwork, Earthlife, the Endangered Wildlife Trust, and the Wildlife and Environmental Society of Southern Africa.

The environmental network in South Africa is described by the author as a web-like universe made up of highly interconnected networks clustered around a few key nodes or hubs, namely EJNF, Groundwork, and Earthlife. It is characterised by a radical decentralisation of authority, with no governing body, official ideology, or mandated leaders, and with minimal hierarchy and horizontal forms of organising.

According to the report, this small environmental justice movement is bridging ecological and social justice issues in that it puts the needs and rights of the economically poor, the excluded, and the marginalised at the centre of its concerns. It is located at the confluence of three of South Africa's key challenges: the struggle against racism, the struggle against poverty and inequality, and the struggle to protect the environment, the natural resource base on which all economic activity depends. The author notes that the movement is stratified in a complex layering involving national networks, non-governmental organisations (NGOs), and local grassroots groups. Within this multiplicity of organisational forms, the vitality of the movement flows from the bottom up, being driven by the unemployed and lower working class. According to the author, this social base is distinctively different from the middle-class composition of the mainstream environmental movement that focuses on curbing species loss and habitat destruction - that is, on "green" issues.

The report concludes that environmental organisations are part of significant new patterns of grassroots mobilisation that are emerging in post-apartheid South Africa which involve a mix of "red" (social justice), "brown", and "green" issues. The anger and energy of these struggles generally comes from the crises experienced by economically poor, vulnerable communities without access to jobs, housing, land, clean water, and sanitation. EJNF and other organisations constitute key nodes in this growing environmental justice movement.

Source

Centre for Civil Society website on February 3 2009; and "SA steel giant 'polluting water'", by Carolyn Dempster, BBC News, September 30 2002 (accessed November 23 2009).