Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Shot Of Transparency, A

0 comments
Affiliation
The Economist print edition
Summary

According to this article, while some countries such as Vietnam and more recently Indonesia, have become more open about sharing information about new disease outbreaks, and in particular avian influenza, most are reluctant to share such information. The reasons behind countries’ reluctance for full disclosure include the fear of losing poultry exports, local panic, a loss of tourist revenue and the desire to be the first to solve the puzzle of a new pandemic and be the first to publish.

This reluctance to share information on avian flu has caused some of the conflicting attitudes found among staff at international organisations like the United Nations' Food and Agriculture Organisation (FAO) and the World Health Organization (WHO). For example, a senior adviser on communicable diseases at the WHO believes that a radical move toward openness may deter countries from sharing data altogether, while a member from the FAO insists that any benefits of hiding data would be short-lived.

Currently there are many groups and coalitions being formed which extol the virtues of openness and transparency. The Global Pandemic Initiative is a collaboration between the WHO and the United States Centres for Disease Control (CDC), together with IBM, a large computer firm and many other groups, which intends to develop software to help predict how diseases might spread, information that could help researchers in the rapid development of vaccines. Another group, the Global Public Health Intelligence Network (GPHIN), a programme run by the Canadian government, searches public databases in seven languages looking for early signs of disease outbreak. In the future, this open database will be expanded to track newspapers and internet blogs in 40 to 100 languages.

According to the article, some critics denounce an open network model because it is based on press reports, and not verified scientific data. Open network supporters argue that press reports have the virtue of immediacy and can often persuade authorities to act more promptly. This proved to be the case during the severe acute respiratory syndrome (SARS) outbreak, where the GPHIN sounded the alarm forcing the authorities to respond, making SARS “the pandemic that did not occur.”