Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Participatory Citizenship, Identity and Inclusion

0 comments
Affiliation

CIVICUS

Date
Summary

This 7-page paper, published by the Open Society Initiative for Southern Africa, addresses some conceptual definitions of participatory citizenship, gives a brief explanation of the correlation between citizenship and participation, discusses participatory democracy, and contrasts participatory democracy with representative democracy and portrays some flaws in relations between elected representatives and their electorates or constituencies. It then explores issues of inclusion versus exclusion and modalities for enhancing participation.

The paper defines participatory citizenship as "the fostering of improvements in relationships between the state and its citizens, and constructing new avenues to redefine relations between the privileged and the less powerful in society.... Embedded in democratic constitutions are rights and freedoms that accompany citizenship, and these rights and freedoms include participation. Participation in democracies should go beyond taking part in voting, and should include participation in governance processes. The notion of citizenship (especially in societies that are stratified) brings in several benefits to some groups and restricts the rights and freedoms of others, as it seldom accommodates completely people with lower status. Traditional notions of participation limit the participation of citizens to the voting processes in democracies and to their involvement with government-owned initiatives that provide services to groups which are of lesser sociopolitical or economic status."

The paper argues that, despite what may be characterised as representative elections, groups of people are excluded from participation based on identity related to: race, gender, age group, economic status, migrant status, ethnic status, disability, political inclinations, or where someone lives. In Africa, as stated here, laws, even constitutions, are changed without citizen inputs, particularly consultation of marginalised groups. Often civil society groups are the representatives of these groups. Civil society groups are being restricted by law in some countries. "In countries such as Swaziland and Zambia, opportunities for citizen participation and civil society actions are inhibited by established legislative laws, while in Zimbabwe similar laws target the media and constrain the activities of civil society and the opposition political parties."


The document recognises the importance of the fact that in the Southern African Developing Countries (SADC) region there have been successfully organised transparent elections and the peaceful transfer of power from incumbents to emerging leaders. However, in some SADC nations, elections, as stated here, "have been plagued with hostility and ruling parties have used various methods of imposing restrictions on the media and civil society." Relations between civil society organisations and governments in countries in Southern Africa are characterised as subservient, collaborative, or antagonistic, often depending on how closely funding is connected to the government. To enhance participation, the document suggests that there is a need for states and civil society organisations to have constructive relationships which are not dependent on sources of funding or the policies pursued by funding networks.


The paper concludes with suggestions for improved opportunity for civil society organisations to enhance citizen participation, leading to more participatory democracies: "Civil society organisations have been constrained by the actions of most governments, and most of these organisations have first to create avenues wherein they can operate in a flexible manner, before making attempts to have a say in government affairs. Effective participation is also constrained by insufficient funds and so the scope and the mandate of networks are limited. Participatory citizenship calls for a renaissance in the relations between citizens and the state and this includes space for participation by representatives of citizens, networks, individuals with unique identities and other non-state actors."

Source

eCIVICUS newsletter on August 14 2008.