Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Parental Perceptions, Attitudes and Acceptance of Childhood Immunization in Saudi Arabia: A Cross Sectional Study

0 comments
Affiliation

University of Hail (Alshammari, Subaiea, Hussain, Moin); King Saud University (Alshammari); Saudi Food and Drug Authority (Alshammari); King Faisal University (Yusuff)

Date
Summary

The requirement of an evidence of childhood vaccination as a prerequisite for school admission appears to be a strong contributing factor to immunisation rates in Saudi Arabia that are comparable to developed countries. However, this requirement may provoke parental vaccine aversion and non-compliance. In light of the fact that a high vaccination rate is an inadequate predictor for the absence of parental concerns or misperceptions, this study assesses the perceptions and attitudes regarding routine childhood immunisation among Saudi parents. The hope is that such an investigation may provide insights useful for developing interventions in other parts of the Islamic world, where rumours that vaccination programmes are covert attempts to cause harm, often spread by religious clergy, threaten vaccine uptake.

A cross-sectional interview of 467 randomly selected parents of children under the age of 5 was conducted between February 1 2016 and February 1 2017 in the Hail region of Saudi Arabia using a pre-tested 18-item questionnaire. Hail is a cosmopolitan city of 600,000 residents with diverse socio-economic backgrounds. The validated questionnaire consisted of 3 sections that collected information on participants' demographics, parents' awareness of vaccine benefits, and parents' practices regarding the immunisation of their children.

The study found that the majority of the respondents were aware of childhood vaccinations (78.9%), completed vaccinations mandated for children up to 5 years (86.2%), encouraged other parents to do so (89.9%), and had easy access to vaccines (90.5%). Sixty to ninety percent of the respondents were knowledgeable regarding the health benefits of vaccinations in children. All the participants (100%) expressed that childhood immunisation is not prohibited in Islam.

Healthcare professionals were the most frequent source of parents' vaccine-related information (65.2%), followed by friends and relatives (61.8%), a Ministry of Health (MoH) mobile vaccination reminder (57.5%), and mass media (53.2%). Approximately half of the participants (45.6%) were not satisfied with the vaccination-related information gleaned from the mass media. To describe one of these sources further: The mobile messaging service provided by the MoH is dedicated to vaccine education, counseling, and reminders about routine vaccinations. The researchers suggest that this service may also serve as a platform allowing professionals to remain in regular contact with parents, filter any vaccine-related information gleaned from the lay media and friends/relatives, and alert parents about any probable misinformation/misconceptions.

According to the researchers, the high parental acceptance of childhood vaccinations appeared to result from different factors, including the observation that 9 of every 10 parents sampled were knowledgeable regarding the protective role of vaccinations against potentially fatal childhood diseases. Furthermore, the majority of the parents did not encounter any challenges accessing childhood immunisation services, and the trends observed in the demographic profile of the parents sampled may have contributed to this. (The majority of the respondents had received a formal education (94.1%), were gainfully employed (62.9%) and had a regular monthly income (73.3%).) For instance, a high educational level appears to be strongly linked to better health literacy and understanding of vaccine-related information and to education and counseling provided at the interpersonal and institutional levels by healthcare professionals and at the societal level during public health education campaigns. This knowledge may enhance informed parental decision-making, acceptance, and compliance with vaccinations against childhood infectious diseases.

In conclusion, some participants might not be convinced about the safety of vaccination, as 5.2% believed that vaccination could be harmful. However, overall, confidence in and acceptance of childhood vaccinations, perceptions of vaccine-related health benefits, and ease of access to immunisations appeared to be quite good among Saudi parents. Suggestions include:

  • Approximately 2 in every 10 parents sampled reported that their children experienced minor adverse events following vaccination, of which 23.2% required doctors' visits. This finding is unsurprising, but parents need to be well informed about the possibility of such events and appropriate measures to mitigate discomfort. This information could be incorporated into the vaccination messages from the MoH mobile reminder service or through specific vaccine-related public awareness programmes presented by the mass media. Furthermore, an institutionalised system for monitoring, detection, and analysis of such events may serve a bulwark against vaccine misinformation.
  • The parental acceptance of vaccinations in Saudi Arabia, despite its entirely Muslim population and its preeminent role in Islam, may prove useful in public enlightenment to close probable vaccine confidence gaps caused by misinformation in other countries with large Muslim populations.
Source

Vaccine Volume 36, Issue 1, Pages 23-28. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.11.050