Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Knowledge of Norovirus and Attitudes toward a Potential Norovirus Vaccine in Rural Guatemala: A Cross-Sectional Exploratory Survey

0 comments
Affiliation

University of Colorado School of Medicine (Olson, Rick, Asturias); Colorado School of Public Health (Olson, Krager, Lamb, Rick, Asturias)

Date
Summary

Vaccine hesitancy appears to be an increasing problem in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) and can be categorised into contextual (i.e., political and cultural barriers) individual/group (i.e., risk/benefit and knowledge), and vaccine-specific (i.e., schedule and cost) influences. Like many LMICs, Guatemala has a high burden of enteric diseases, including norovirus. In anticipation of forthcoming vaccines, the researchers characterised norovirus vaccine attitudes in a rural Guatemalan community and explored associations between sociodemographic factors, vaccine hesitancy, and willingness to pay (WTP).

Cluster-randomised households with children aged 6 weeks to 17 years were enrolled into one of 2 norovirus surveillance studies: (i) a prospective cohort (N = 207 households) and (ii) 2 separate, community-based, cross-sectional surveys (N = 420 households). A 66-question vaccine knowledge and attitude survey was administered to the heads of households via in-person interview by local study nurses. The survey was adapted, in part, from a previously validated World Health Organization (WHO) Strategic Advisory Group of Experts (SAGE) on Vaccine Hesitancy report and a survey assessing knowledge and attitudes about dengue virus and vaccine hesitancy.

Most households demonstrated an appropriate understanding of norovirus transmission and symptoms. Most respondents (84%) reported receiving health information from the Ministry of Health (MOH), and 544 (97%) indicated interest in a norovirus vaccine. Households with higher education had greater WTP for a vaccine (prevalence ratios = 2.2, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.2-3.1).

The 4% (N = 20) of respondents who were uninterested in a norovirus vaccine were 9.8 (95% CI 1.9-51.6) times as likely to believe that vaccines in general do not prevent serious disease and 4.3 (95% CI 1.4-13.7) times as likely to have refused a vaccine in the past. These households receive their information about diarrhoea primarily from the MOH (80%), neighbours (40%), and television (25%). The MOH was also the most trusted source for information about diarrhoea in this group (85%). Households with low WTP were more likely to be crowded, receive their medical care from a pharmacy, and obtain their health information from the radio and MOH.

In other studies cited here, fear of adverse effects, exposure to rumours regarding a vaccine, and lack of awareness are among the factors associated with decreased vaccine acceptance. On the other hand, a physician's recommendation for a vaccine and known protection against severe diseases have previously been shown to improve vaccine acceptability. "Although more data are needed, MOH and community-level education may offer an approach to overcome hesitancy in this community...."

"These results suggest that a future norovirus vaccination program could be acceptable and feasible even in rural areas." However, "[a]s norovirus and other enteric vaccines advance in their preclinical development, future studies should explore vaccine acceptability in relation to the estimated efficacy, the number of doses, additional variables (household income and ethnicity), and the behaviors and determinants of the small group expressing some vaccine hesitancy."

Source

American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene. 2018 May; 98(5): 1498-1501. doi: 10.4269/ajtmh.17-0771. Image credit: Colorado School of Public Health's Center for Global Health