Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

The Impact of Toxic Trolling Comments on Anti-vaccine YouTube Videos

0 comments
Affiliation

Indiana University Bloomington (Miyazaki, Kwak, An); Sugakubunka Co., Ltd. (Uchiba); Tokyo Institute of Technology (Sasahara)

Date
Summary

"...research bears essential implications for managing public health messaging and online communities, particularly in moderating fear-mongering messages about vaccines on social media."

YouTube has become a primary source of information for many individuals regarding vaccines. The comment section on YouTube videos not only provides feedback for video creators but also serves as a venue for communication and information sharing among viewers. Comments on online content shape viewers' perceptions of the content itself. However, the comment section is often plagued by uncivil comments by so-called "trolls", particularly on anti-vaccine videos. Online toxicity can incite fear, a connection especially pertinent in the context of vaccine hesitancy. Drawing on 484 anti-vaccine videos and 414,436 corresponding comments, the quantitative analysis in this study examines the relationship between toxicity and fear in the comment sections of YouTube videos related to anti-vaccine content.

This study examined whether toxicity in comments for a video is associated with the level of fear expressed in the comments for the same video on YouTube. To do so, the researchers first analysed the relationship between toxicity and fear at the video level. The definition of a toxic comment is "a rude, disrespectful, or unreasonable comment that is likely to make you leave a discussion". Such comments include offensive to others, negative, or hateful. The researchers employed a machine learning approach - Google's Perspective API and a RoBERTa-based model - to quantify fear and toxicity levels in each comment and computed their mean for each video.

First, the researchers identified the lack of relationship between toxicity and fear in individual comments. This is because if toxicity and fear in individual comments were strongly correlated or equivalent, the subsequent results at the aggregated level would be trivial. They then focused on both the video and the comment levels, specifically, early and later comments, while controlling for other relevant variables, to gain insights into the association between toxicity and fear in comments. They found a substantial connection between toxicity and fear in YouTube comments when analysed at the video level. This finding suggests that toxicity and fear cooccur within the comment sections. The phenomenon of emotional contagion, in which fear in a video's title, description, and transcripts correlates with fear in comments, highlights the association of emotions in video content. Early fear is strongly associated with later fear, confirming the contagion of homogeneous emotions.

Another key finding was the greater association of toxicity in highly liked comments, which were approximately 30% more influential than in ordinary comments. "This calls for a re-evaluation of the policies and algorithms that amplify the visibility of liked comments on online platforms. For example, platforms could remove highly toxic comments, or at minimum, place them lower in the display order, regardless of their like count." In addition, the study found that fear in comments was significantly associated with the topics of viruses and children's diseases, which aligns with previous research linking these topics to fear among anti-vaccine groups.

Thus, these findings suggest that initial troll comments can evoke negative emotions in viewers, potentially fueling vaccine hesitancy. The results may have implications for moderation policies on online platforms. Conventionally, the focus on toxicity in online comments has centred on its direct impact on the target of the message, such as the owner of the video. However, this study highlights how comments also significantly associate with the emotions of other viewers. "As commenting on various online content, such as videos, news, and e-commerce, profoundly impacts user experiences, it is imperative for platform providers to consider the wider effects of toxic messages..."

Source

Scientific Reports (2024) 14:5088. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-54925-w. Image credit: Freepik