Evidence: Perceptions of Influence: Understanding Attitudes to Polio Vaccination and Immunisation in Northern Nigeria
Perceptions of Influence: Understanding Attitudes to Polio Vaccination and Immunisation in Northern Nigeria
Editor's note: For a summary of this paper on The CI site (and access to annexes, etc.), click here.
Name(s) of author(s)?:
Sebastian Taylor
Who published this paper, article, book (chapter) or other publication?:
The Communication Initiative
What are the best extracts that highlight the evidence for the impact of a communication for development, social change, behaviour change, public engagement, or informed citizen strategy on a development issue and priority?:
...[S]ettlements at higher risk of refusing OPV have systematically lower levels of community-level activity (households reporting participation in community meetings)." Approximately 31% of women in very-high-risk (VHR) settlements had attended a religious meeting; in contrast, approximately 55% of women in very-low-risk (VLR) settlements had done so. Women in VHR settlements who had attended those religious meetings had a 0.261 propensity to refuse oral polio vaccine (OPV); in contrast, those in VLR settlements who had attended those meetings had a 0.699 propensity to refuse. This corresponds to -15.66 t-stat. Approximately 18% of women in VHR settlements had attended a village development meeting; in contrast, approximately 39% of women in VLR settlements had done so. Women in VHR settlements who had attended those village development meetings had a 0.157 propensity to refuse OPV; in contrast, those in VLR settlements who had attended those meetings had a 0.581 propensity to refuse. This corresponds to -16.64 t-stat. Approximately 18% of women in VHR settlements had attended a health committee meeting; in contrast, approximately 35% of women in VLR settlements had done so. Women in VHR settlements who had attended those health committee meetings had a 0.142 propensity to refuse OPV; in contrast, those in VLR settlements who had attended those meetings had a 0.519 propensity to refuse. This corresponds to -14.94 t-stat. Approximately 12% of women in VHR settlements had attended a non-governmental organisation (NGO) meeting; in contrast, approximately 22% of women in VLR settlements had done so. Women in VHR settlements who had attended those NGO meetings had a 0.102 propensity to refuse OPV; in contrast, those in VLR settlements who had attended those meetings had a 0.332 propensity to refuse. This corresponds to -10.28 t-stat.
To which development issue does this evidence and impact data relate?:
Polio
To which strategic approach(es) does the evidence and impact data relate?:
Interpersonal communication; community participation
What research methodology (ies) was/were used to produce this evidence and impact data?:
Adapting a methodology from Qualitative Comparative Analysis (QCA) that involved using a mix of qualitative and quantitative approaches, this research randomly sampled 30 households per settlement in 60 settlements within wards and local government areas (LGAs) in Sokoto, Kano, and Bauchi states of northern Nigeria.
What is the URL to access this paper, article, book (chapter) or other publication?:
https://www.comminit.com/files/perceptionsofinfluence.pdf
Participating organisations in the Global Alliance for Social and Behaviour Change - Building Informed and Engaged Societies were asked to identify, in their opinion, the 5 most compelling research and evaluation studies that demonstrate the direct impact of this field of work on a major development issue. This was one of the nominees. For the full compiled list, please click here. For the compilation of the key impact data across all research evidence identified, please click here.











































