Development action with informed and engaged societies
After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future.
 
Co-founder Victoria Martin is pleased to see this work continue under Wits' leadership. Victoria knows that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction.
 
We honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades. Meanwhile, La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA) continues independently at cila.comminitcila.com and is linked with The CI Global site.
Time to read
1 minute
Read so far

Building Trust and Responding to Adverse Effects Following Immunisation in South Asia

0 comments
Affiliation
United Nations Children's Fund Regional Office for South Asia
Summary

This working paper addresses the communication efforts needed to prepare
for and address adverse effects following immunisation (AEFI). Serious AEFI can, according to the authors, erode public confidence
and contribute to a drop in immunisation rates. Communication strategies should, therefore, provide a comprehensive communication plan that does more than deal with individual cases
in an ad-hoc manner.



The authors make the following recommendations to managers who may face real or perceived cases of
AEFI:

  • Respond swiftly with accurate information based on evidence;
  • Know how to deal with broad vaccine safety issues, often coming from the
    media versus individual AEFI cases;
  • In case of a rumour, assess the origins of the rumour and be prepared with a number of potential strategies to counter them;
  • Foster long-term partnerships with professional organisations and credible national
    spokespersons inside and outside the Ministry of Health;
  • Collaborate with the national immunisation committee dealing with vaccine safety
    issues;
  • Work through different channels and spokespeople to promote accurate information and
    cooperation to ultimately enhance public trust in immunisation;
  • Monitor the community's knowledge, attitudes and practices toward immunisation
    particularly after an adverse event has occurred;
  • Document lessons learned in handling communication responses to AEFI.

The paper expands on this advice by recommending proactive communication plans,
and providing advice for communication with health workers, families, communities
and the media. Suggested communication techniques vary by group, and the authors
recommend different techniques for subgroups, such as radio, television or print
media.


Evaluation of any communication intervention is essential, according the
the authors, to determine how much has been accomplished and how future
interventions can do better. The authors suggest methods to monitor public
opinion, including methodologies, indicators and evaluation techniques.



This paper also provides examples of adverse events that occurred in Bangladesh,
Pakistan, India and Afghanistan. Each case study lists the responses that took
place, and the lessons that can be drawn. The authors recommend this type of
documentation and analysis whenever a  response occurs to an AEFI.

Source

Email from Ulrike Gilbert to The Communication Initiative, July 28 2005.