Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
2 minutes
Read so far

Rhetoric and African Politicians

2 comments

Like Zambia, in many african countries, most politicians behave like it is described in this article - Zambia’s Modern Day Politicians and Lost Art of Rhetoric - by Daniel Tonga: they use political speeches to divide people, even to promote tribalism, anarchy and hate among citizens. it is a sad reality, and sometimes journalist are afraid to talk about it. Such a bad behavior as you told effectively is seen both among ruling and opposition political parties unfortunately.

In Niger, my native country, "there is no art of rhetoric" like in Zambia and many others african countries probably. In Niger, the result is an increasing disapointment of citizen and particulary Youth about politicians and politics itself. In discussions, you often hear : they are all the same.

Personally, I wonder if it is really a question of lack of skill in rethoric. If I take the exemple of Niger, most politicians, whether from ruling party or from opposition party, if they should have an exam in rhetoric, they would probably pass it.

According to me, it is more a question of sincere dedication towards the country development. What really makes the difference between politicians who make positive speeches to unite people and politicians who use speeches to divide people ? Probably, the degree of their sincere commitment for democracy... As, "rhetoric and democracy are inextricable", don't you think too that "rhetoric and dedication" are also inextricable ?It is so easy for any politician to tell he is a democrate, but in acts, it is so difficult to behave like a democrate... That's the real challenge, which could help to understand why rhetoric is probably voluntary neglected by some modern african politicians.

If a politician is a sincere democrate, he will naturally seek to master the art of rhetoric, whether he doesn't have this needed skill. But, if he is a "fallacious" democrate, using the word democracy only in speeches but not demonstrating it in acts, even if he is a master in rhetoric, he will not use it unfortunately. Using the art of the rhetoric as it is defined, is not a strategical goal for some politicians, because only one thing motivates them. If they belong to the ruling party  : staying as long as they can the ruling party whatever it may cost for the country. If they belong to the opposition party : leaving the status of opposition party as soon as they can whatever it may cost for the country. Citizen, especially the majority illeterate from rural areas,  are manipulated by both sides in this fight for power. Whatever the result of this political fight, that will mean no significative change for local communities sustainable development : that's the the real tragedy of the lost of rhetoric among politicians in Africa.....

Comments

Submitted by Prettyojuli on Fri, 01/19/2018 - 14:30 Permalink

The meaning of politics sounds different in the eyes of the electorates and same in the ears of the politicians. The electorates feel the falsehood, the hate and the impunity concentrated in the rhetorics of the politicians. They also see it as the tool to manipulate the masses for votes which would make them stay in power forever, if need be.

the electorates know that the politicians can promise them the moon, but insicerity it shall never happen, but fear of disassociation they vote for them when a little peanut is based them.

My heart shall always wish that the political rhetoric would be used to promote peaceful co-existence and sustainbility for all.