Development action with informed and engaged societies

After nearly 28 years, The Communication Initiative (The CI) Global is entering a new chapter. 

Following a period of transition, the global website has been transferred to the University of the Witwatersrand (Wits) in South Africa, where it will be administered by the Social and Behaviour Change Communication Division. Wits' commitment to social change and justice makes it a trusted steward for The CI's legacy and future. 

On the transfer, co-founder Victoria Martin expressed her pleasure to see this work continue under Wits' leadership, knowing that co-founder Warren Feek (1953–2024) would have felt deep pride in The CI Global's Africa-led direction. 

As Wits, we honour the team and partners who sustained The CI for decades and look forward building from that strong base. This includes co-founders Warren Feek (1953-2024) and Victoria Martin as well as La Iniciativa de Comunicación (CILA), which continues independently at lainiciativadecomunicacion.com with links to The CI Global site. We are also eager to forge new partnerships and entertain new ideas as we consider how best to contribute to social and behaviour change in our rapidly evolving environment.

If you are joining the International Social and Behaviour Change Communication (SBCC) Summit in Panama, please join Wits and CILA on Monday, 22 June, to share your thoughts and suggestion for the relaunch of the Communication Initiative. We will be in Pacifica 5 from 12-1:25 for the Refuel, Reflect, and Renew Lunch Series: The Communication Initiative: celebrating a driving force for Communication for Social Change and the way forward. We will reflect on the legacy of Warren Feek and family in creating the Communication Initiative, consider the contributions of CI over the years and then turn our attention towards the future in this dynamic session. 

If you are unable to join us in Panama, we still want to hear from you. Please contribute your thoughts by following this link: https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026 or reaching out to ci_surveys@commint.com

You can also follow the QR Code:

 https://redcap.link/CommunicationInitiative2026

Time to read
3 minutes
Read so far

Prevention of COVID-19 in Internally Displaced Persons Camps in War-Torn North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo: A Mixed-Methods Study

0 comments
Affiliation

Université Catholique du Graben (Kasereka, Muyisa, Kahindo); University of Alberta (Hawkes)

Date
Summary

"These results call for an ethical, inclusive approach to the global pandemic that leaves no one behind, just as COVID-19 will not respect borders and will not leave behind refugees and IDPs..."

The conditions in which displaced populations (refugees and internally displaced persons [IDPs]) live complicate COVID-19 control measures in low-and middle-income countries (LMICs), particularly in conflict zones such as North Kivu, Democratic Republic of the Congo (DRC). With the goal of contributing to the improvement of prevention strategies among a highly vulnerable and neglected group facing the pandemic in an environment of extreme scarcity and insecurity, this study assessed the knowledge, attitudes, and practices (KAPs) of IDPs in Eastern DRC with respect to the prevention of COVID-19.

The mixed-methods study involved qualitative focus group discussion (FGDs) and quantitative (52-item survey questionnaire) data collection. Specifically, first, the researchers conducted 6 FGDs, involving 23 participants in total, in 3 IDP camps (Mwangaza, Masosi, and Luvangira) located near the rural commune of Oïcha, North Kivu. The groups included adult women (3 FGDs) and men (2 FGDs) who were heads of households, and youth (1 FGD). The following themes emerged from the FGDs:

  1. Displacement narratives - e.g., "On 1 side, the insecurity, and on the other, this corona—yes, we are scared. I'm just in shock..." (FGD5, F5)
  2. Population movements in and out of the camp and risk of introducing COVID-19 - e.g., "There is a constant coming and going of people from outside the camp and vice-versa." (FGD 6, F11)
  3. High level of awareness and fear of COVID-19 - e.g., "Ebola killed people, yes, but the radio talks of frightening numbers of deaths due to corona. Really very many." (FGD6, F9)
  4. Challenges associated with hand hygiene in the camp - e.g., "You have to wash your hands. That's what they say, but we don't have water here." (FGD4, Y2)
  5. Impossibility of physical distancing in the IDP camp - e.g., "Here, it's not possible 'ku achana metre moya moya' [to stay 1 meter apart; to practice physical distancing]. If it comes here, we will all die..." (FGD1, M4)
  6. Restoring peace and security takes priority over vaccine - e.g., "If security returns, we will protect ourselves against corona, we will respect all the measures, and it's only at that time that you can start talking about a vaccine or physical distancing. But in these conditions, I wouldn't accept this vaccine." (FGD5, F5)

The FDGs revealed that public health messages about the severity of COVID-19 appear to be widely accepted and believed, with participants citing the high number of deaths in wealthy "white" countries and the closing of churches as evidence of danger. Although mistrust in the government), belief in corruption, and belief in conspiracy theories were prevalent, endorsement of these views did not appear to be associated with prevention practices. This is likely due to barriers and challenges such as those identified above. Another worrisome finding: "Expressions of futility or fatalism as expressed by FGD participants in our study are noteworthy and may reflect learned helplessness or loss of self-efficacy among IDPs under extraordinarily difficult living conditions."

For the quantitative component, a local Congolese physician with tacit knowledge of the circumstances, culture, and language of the IDPs chose the appropriate wording of the survey's questions and ensured the content was relevant for the conditions in the IDP camp. From May 25-29 2020, a study team member - a local Congolese health worker with tacit understanding of the language and culture, biomedical understanding of COVID-19, and past experience administering surveys by verbal interview - administered the questionnaire and recorded the participant's answers using a field-adapted electronic data collection tool. The final sample consisted of 164 IDPs (66 from Mwangaza; 44 Masosi, and 54 Luvangira) and 143 in the comparison group. There were 74 women (45%) among the IDPs surveyed and 57 women (40%) in the comparison group. Selected findings:

  • IDPs and the comparison group both identified local radio as their major source of information on COVID-19. Radio, television, and social media were more common sources of information among the comparison group, whereas church was a more common source among IDPs.
  • Overall, 15% of IDPs had sufficient knowledge of COVID-19, versus 30% of the comparison group. Other factors associated with low COVID-19 knowledge in bivariate analyses included younger age, larger household size, and lack of radio ownership. In a multivariable logistic regression model adjusting for these possible confounders, IDP status remained statistically significantly associated with lower knowledge.
  • Despite widespread agreement (89%) that physical distancing was important to prevent COVID-19, a higher proportion of IDPs than individuals in the comparison group reported close contact with someone outside the family in the past 24 hours, and a higher proportion had shaken hands with at least 1 person.
  • By self-report, 83 (61%), 62 (38%), and 19 (12%) left the camp on a daily, weekly, and monthly basis, respectively. In addition, 107 (65%) of IDPs had received a visitor from outside the camp in the past month.

In general, IDPs were found to have differed from neighbouring Congolese residents in terms of larger household size (including 46% of families with a member over the age of 60), more extreme poverty, lower educational attainment, less access to information through media and internet, less COVID-19-specific knowledge, lower rate of physical distancing, and reduced access to hand hygiene. These factors, as well as the high mobility of IDPs, leaving and reentering the camp daily for subsistence labor, establish their vulnerability to COVID-19.

Based on the qualitative and quantitative data, the researchers recommend:

  • Provide IDPs with adequate facilities and tools (e.g., face masks) to implement recommended COVID-19 precautions.
  • Make additional space and housing available to allow IDPs to practice physical distancing, particularly within sleeping quarters.
  • Work to restore peace by controlling armed conflict in the area, so as to allow IDPs to safely return to their ancestral homes, where they could more adequately practice COVID-19 prevention.
Source

Global Health: Science and Practice October 2020, https://doi.org/10.9745/GHSP-D-20-00272; and email from Michael Hawkes to The Communication Initiative on October 24 2020. Image credit: UN Photo/Marie Frechon - labeled with a creative commons licence - via Flickr